I’m going to say this and I’m sure its going to draw fire from a bunch of you, but here goes:
Barack Obama should be impeached.
There. I said it.
And more importantly, I believe it.
Here’s the thing: Barack Obama has expanded upon the targeted Predator drone killings of “terrorists” started under Bush/Cheney to such a degree that even a depraved, amoral sociopath like General Michael Hayden — Bush’s CIA Director — feels that Obama has gone too far.

Under Obama we have shed any vestige of being a nation of laws by his assertion that as president he can order the killing of an American citizen without any due process whatsoever, simply in the name of the Global War on Terror and because he, The Leader, has determined that a particular American must be killed.
His reasoning being that an American who takes up arms against his native land is an “enemy combatant” and therefore forfeits any expectation of due process.
Which for a so-called constitutional scholar like Obama to make an assertion like that is so incredibly fucked as to be beyond belief.
Because what an American citizen who takes up arms and becomes an “enemy combatant” against the United States is . . . is a traitor. A traitor who has committed TREASON.
Which is a . . . . . wait for it . . . .
CRIME
The Constitution is pretty fucking clear on this issue — here’s Article 3 Section 3 of that document:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
And the key word in that passage is “convicted.”
In America you aren’t supposed to be able to be convicted of a crime without a trial. A trial that the law requires you to be present at and at which you get to defend yourself and challenge the two or more witnesses who claim that you’re traitor.
And you are certainly not supposed to be able to be convicted of a crime and sentenced to death by the President of the United States simply because he got told by someone that you deserve to die.
Even if they’re right and you are a terrorist and you do deserve to die.
Because first and foremost you’re still an American with constitutional rights.
Anwar al-Awlaki along with Samir Khan were killed together this past year by a Predator drone strike ordered by Barack Obama.
Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan were both American citizens and by all accounts they probably were terrorists who were either actively levying war against the U.S. or providing aid and comfort to those who were and were, therefore, committing treason.
But you don’t forfeit your rights by being accused of a crime, or of even actually committing that crime. Even if that crime is treason.
And under Article 3 of the Constitution treason is most definitely viewed as a crime — as it has been by every court decision since that article was written. And if you stand charged with committing a crime then the government is supposed to be compelled to prove in a court of law and beyond a reasonable doubt that you’ve committed that crime before they can take your life.
Additionally, the courts have been crystal clear for over 100 years that convictions in absentia are illegal and violate due process under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. So if you want to say that an American is a traitor and you want to convict him of treason {or being an “enemy combatant”} you’re supposed to have to go get him and bring him back to stand trial.
Not blow him up with a targeted drone strike.
But now we order the killing of Americans just because the President gets told by some unaccountable, nameless intelligence bureaucrat that so and so is a terrorist and therefore no longer worthy of his constitutional rights and that its OK to go ahead and order his murder without a trial.
And that is why Barack Obama should be impeached.
Because no one is above the law.
And the question needs to be asked — if killing an American with a drone strike who’s been identified as a terrorist and a traitor but who hasn’t been tried and convicted is OK, then why isn’t it OK to kill an American with a drone strike or targeted assassination who’s been accused of say, murder, and who has fled the country to a nation that won’t extradite him.
And then having done that, at what point do we start letting the president — or maybe a secret committee, because the president is so busy — decide to kill Americans or arrest and hold them indefinitely and without a trial for lesser crimes?
Or to do so because maybe the president simply doesn’t like a persons politics or what they have to say about him?